Files
gitdan-actions/scripts
claudeandClaude Opus 5 719475831b fix(cargo-cache): scope the safety claim to what the code actually prevents
Follow-up to f57e2a6, addressing the reviewer's sharpest question: is the race
"closed by construction", or merely detected and retried? The honest answer is
"both, on different paths", and the README said only the first half.

* README now states three claims separately instead of collapsing them:
  a publisher rotating a snapshot cannot tear a clone of it (by construction —
  the marker ordering prevents the unlink, and the consumer's verification is
  a redundant second check on that path); every OTHER way the source can
  change mid-clone is detected, not prevented (the eviction pass's reader
  check is check-then-delete, and a seed-fallback-dir has no interlock at all
  — there, verification plus a bounded retry and a loud failure is the whole
  guard); and disk reclamation is bounded rather than immediate. Overclaiming
  this property once was the finding; overclaiming it twice would be worse.

* publish-snapshot-selftest.sh now covers the PUBLISHER's half of the race,
  where a reader of the swap belongs. Scenario 3 only ever covered a consumer
  that had already FINISHED cloning — safe for free, since its own hardlinks
  keep the inodes alive. New scenario 6 covers a reader still in flight past
  the grace period (the generation is left on disk, the deferral is warned
  about, and an earlier consumer is still unaffected); scenario 7 covers the
  sweep, so "we defer instead of forcing" cannot quietly become a disk leak.
  Red-proven against 248af306's scripts:

    ASSERTION FAILED: the previous generation was unlinked while a reader
    still held it

  The consumer's half stays in seed-target-dir-selftest.sh scenario 8, which
  still red-proves at 16693 of 48805 entries against the same scripts.

* seed-target-dir-selftest.sh now asserts what happens when the retries are
  EXHAUSTED, not just what hardlink_clone_into returns: an unreadable source
  makes the seed script exit non-zero, name the reason, leave no target dir,
  and — the one that matters — not fall through to its cold-start branch. A
  corrupt-cache bug degrading into an invisible 4x-slower CI job is the
  failure mode worth pinning down. Skipped when running as root, where mode
  bits deny nothing.

* usage_kb: a directory we cannot read measured as the empty string, which was
  then spliced into usage_gb's awk program and made it a syntax error at the
  exact moment something was already going wrong. Now measures 0.

Verification: `bash scripts/selftest.sh` — 5 suites, exit 0, 82 assertions
(was 75 after f57e2a6, 63 before). shellcheck over scripts/: no new findings.

Measured the cost the reviewer asked about, on ext4, warm cache, 78,554
entries: `cp -al` 3126 ms against 44 ms for one `find | wc -l`. Two counts per
attempt is ~2.8% on top of the clone. Not measured on the CI runner's volume.

Refs: daniel/gitdan#11, zemyna#911

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Sqh2vscfzisk83VuPVQX9L
2026-08-23 16:49:44 -05:00
..